Ha ha, Quintin! But you're getting a dialogue about it anyways, cuz I'm bored. Why not interperet the word "mad" as in angry rather than crazy? That way, neither of you wins--yes, you both get mad, but neither of you is angry full time (knock on wood). Because, if it's crazy, Anschel wins hands down!
To elaborate on my previous comment (which I accidently posted as annonymous) there are actually a lot of ways you two could define mad...check out: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-48,GGLG:en&q=define%3A+mad I'm actually suprised you two haven't started arguing over which one of you is a better socialist...I guess it isn't in your names
3 comments:
i said that as a joke!!!!!
Ha ha, Quintin! But you're getting a dialogue about it anyways, cuz I'm bored. Why not interperet the word "mad" as in angry rather than crazy? That way, neither of you wins--yes, you both get mad, but neither of you is angry full time (knock on wood). Because, if it's crazy, Anschel wins hands down!
To elaborate on my previous comment (which I accidently posted as annonymous) there are actually a lot of ways you two could define mad...check out: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-48,GGLG:en&q=define%3A+mad
I'm actually suprised you two haven't started arguing over which one of you is a better socialist...I guess it isn't in your names
Post a Comment