Madder Socialist

Idiosyncrasy

2007-01-03T21:55:00.000-05:00

Why does adblock.com have popups?

Kucinich and Colbert

2007-10-17T00:11:00.000-04:00

Dennis Kucinich appears on the Colbert Report (if this doesn't work, try this)

Gonzales Resigns!

2007-08-27T12:42:00.000-04:00

In the seemingly never-ending march toward the total resignation of the entire administration, Alberto Gonzales has resigned from his post as Attorney General. In my opinion, Mr. Gonzales had, like Rumsfeld before him, been a buffer between the public and the vice-president, a sort of whipping boy, who took the blame for what were clearly the vice-president or president's bad decisions.

To me this seems like paving the way for Bush's own resignation. Think about it: the replacements have never been the old cronies who would risk all for their President. They are politicians themselves, and won't go down willingly for Bush.

It's certainly a start.

A Departure

2007-08-17T14:23:00.001-04:00

This may be a bit of a departure from my normal writing, but I think this song really does capture some of my philosophy.

For those of you who are wondering, yes, this song is from a Disney movie, Pocahontas, and it took me a few times hearing it to really take it for what it is, to appreciate what the lyrics are saying. So sit back, relax, put your prejudice behind you, and just listen to the words of wisdom.

Hope you enjoyed that!

2007-06-01T10:19:00.000-04:00

I am often told, when arguing about religious beliefs, that without religion one cannot have moral justice. One cannot call Hitler immoral if one has no "objective" standards of morality. But Hitler, along with Pope Urban II, who authorized the crusades, and Osama bin Ladin, who was responsible for the deaths of 2,947 on September 11th, 2001, believed that he was doing the right thing, and the moral thing, and the thing which would lead him to paradise. In fact, all three of these men believed this because of a religious book which claimed objective moral teaching. There is nothing particularly malicious in the bible itself, of course, but rather in the fact that moral beliefs are dictated or taught, rather than carefully meditated on and chosen. I hope the following will be a decent response to both problems, that of defining morality within the confines of atheism, and that of creating a code of morality which may be truly objective because of its room for subjectivity.
There can be no gods. The existence of a god dilutes the perfect purity of the ideal religion, which is no religion at all but rather a pure moral code. If we choose to do something because of what our god's interpreter (a religious leader) has told us, we must accept the possibility that this interpreter has mistook or lied about the most moral course. The basic element of morality is suffering and happiness. The solution to any moral dilemma is then, in theory at least, to think what the effects of each choice will be for those involved: which will cause the most happiness and the least suffering. Each human being must independently decide for him or herself what to weigh in the balance. For example, do humans count as much as other animals? Is a fly, with no nerves or brain to speak of, as important as a mammal which can feel real pain? Is a child or some other helpless person more important, on the grounds that, left to their own devices, they would not do the right thing for themselves? What about a human fetus? Or someone who is guilty of a heinous crime? There is no universal truth in any of this. Every human being must decide the answers for him or herself.
To me the answer to each of these questions is clear, and I use those answers in my everyday life to determine my opinion on the moral problems facing us today. For example, abortion, on which I hold the typical left-wing view. I challenge anyone who claims to be pro-life to answer this question: is the life of a living being with less brain cells than a fly, whose life as an unwanted child will almost certainly be painful, more important then the lifestyle of a young woman who has inadvertently become pregnant.
Through these decisions one can form a system of morality independent of dogma.

NovellHatSoft-CanoniSpire

2007-04-01T12:10:00.000-04:00

In an amazing turn of events, CanoniSpire has merged with Novell, Red Hat, and Microsoft to form NovellHatSoft-CanoniSpire. The new conglomerate will produce Winux, a proprietary, Linux-based, Windows lookalike, which will come without the security flaws common to Windows.

NovellHatSoft-CanoniSpire has been lobbying congress to pass a "software rights management act" which will assign copyright for the Linux kernel and GNU utils to a new "GPLv0," which will be a non-viral, BSD-type license, written by the newly employed RMS, who accepted a job offer from the company this morning.

Canonical founder Mark Shuttleworth said "Finally, we have a Free Software solution which can challenge desktop Windows. Well, at least we have a Free Software-based solution which can challenge SnApple's new SolariMac Desktop," referring to the merger of Sun Microsystems and Apple Computer.

Steve Ballmer, who just hours ago had joined the Linux Foundation and was claiming to have accepted surrender, said he was "glad that the merger is under way," and hopes "to see it carried out to its logical conclusion by a Winux Vista release this summer."

Linus Torvalds was unavailable for comment.

If GPL were software (and source code were multimedia)...

2007-02-16T22:44:00.000-05:00

... The FSF would be against GPLv3.

Imagine: some software/music, say GCC, is released/distributed under GPLv2. People can do whatever they want with it: redistribute it, reuse it in their own source code/music, or whatever. Then GPLv3 comes out. Suddenly the software/music won't work on/play in your hardware/software.

How is this different from DRM?

The FSF has gone so far to fight against DRM that it has created some of its own. In my opinion, this is the same mistake Lenin made: a far right totalitarian regime was replaced by a far left totalitarian regime.

Viral licenses are incredibly dangerous because they put someone like the FSF in charge of something they didn't write: imagine Linux without the GNU utilities. So RMS, who wrote some section of the code, controls the whole.

I really hope this isn't true, so if someone disagrees please comment extensively.

killall -9 Microsoft_inc

2006-12-24T18:59:00.000-05:00

I wish it were that easy. Ever try to kill a process with the "Windows Task Manager?" If a process isn't responding, it simply won't die. Not exactly sure why that is but it always says "are you sure you want to do this?" (or something similar) and then doesn't seem to do it even if you click "OK." Luckily, even if you don't kill Windows processes the WTM way, they tend to die on their own. And that is what will probably come of another "runaway process."

Microsoft may be bringing about it own demise. Although unaware, Microsoft's life depends on what it calls "piracy." Think of it this way: bloggers and news analysts are saying that Vista's "anti-piracy" tactics will turn people to Linux.

Or think about this: many people see Windows as easy "home territory" where they know how to do everything. It's appeal, and their idea of "easy" or "user-friendly," is defined by how similar something is to what they're used to. And what they're used to is currently (drum roll please) XP or 98. Although the new UI is better designed, it will lose the "old faithful" feel which has made so many consider it easier than Linux or OSX.

Microsoft is tearing itself to pieces, so lets just sit back and enjoy the show.

Iceweasel: Update

2006-12-24T19:57:00.000-05:00

Not very long ago, I said that everyone was talking about Iceweasel. Not so anymore. Remember my prediction? I said it didn't matter at all, and now no one even remembers that there is such a thing. I currently use Firefox because it's in the Ubuntu repos and I don't really care so long as it's open source.

Update Concerning FF2.0 and Grandma-Friendly FOSS

2006-10-28T22:02:00.000-04:00

I am in Atlanta this weekend on a double mission. Firstly, or at least nominally, I am here to help my Grandmother, who has been using Windows ME since the turn of the century and WordPerfect considerably longer, adjust to Windows XP and the modern world. It has taken considerable persuasion to get her to use the new XP box and not the old 98 monster in the attic.

Secondly and more personally, I am trying to win her over to the FOSS world. I have, within the past several hours, installed Firefox 2.0, OpenOffice.org, and AVG free. That may not seem like much, but she proceeded to ask me if I could come down one time and install Linux on her computer. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL! I must have done something right.

As for Firefox 2.0, I simply love it. The two add-ons I used to install immediately when I installed Firefox were Tab Mix Plus and some theme, usually Abstract PC. Tab Mix Plus has been pretty much completely incorporated and the horrendous 1.5 theme has been replaced by a theme reminiscent of the Ubuntu Human theme.

PS: If you are reading this, said Grandmother has read this post without forcing me to unpost it.

Iceweasel

2006-10-15T12:01:00.000-04:00

Everyone in the Gnu/Linux world (or the Linux world or the Gnu world or the Mozilla world or the FOSS world or whatever) has been publishing their opinions on Iceweasel, the new trademark-free Firefox clone from Gnu and Debian, so here's mine:

Who cares? I mean this totally honestly. Who cares whether Debian uses another name for Firefox? People are talking about how Firefox's market share will be damaged, this is destroying brand recognition, it will make people feel unsafe using Linux. Wait a minute. Just wait a minute. Ubuntu, the most user-friendly and most-used distribution, already uses a "generic" icon for Firefox. So what's wrong with also changing the name? Really, I have trouble seeing the difference it will make to anyone other than a FOSS fanatic. Personally, I try to use FOSS, but I don't cringe at the prospect of good, free, proprietary software if the FOSS equivalent is much less powerful.

God

2006-10-14T21:00:00.000-04:00

Rather an ominous title, no? Anyway, I was looking around on the web and I found arguments (which I am inclined to agree with) that God didn't create the world, but rather a Flying Spaghetti Monster. Interesting idea, no? So here's Michelangelo remastered:

New Feed

2006-10-13T20:09:00.000-04:00

I have switched to the new Blogger Beta so if you subscribe to an RSS or Atom feed the URL has changed. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Foley+Bush

2006-10-13T14:14:00.000-04:00

I found this on Quintin's blog. A good play on the Clinton impeachment and the Foley scandal.

Linux in Developing Countries

2006-10-11T20:23:00.000-04:00

Firstly, my apologies to anyone who might actually read this blog, as I haven't posted in a while.

Anyway, I read in the New York Times today that Libya has signed a contract with One Laptop Per Child, which will provide Libya's schools with a $100 laptop for each of Libya's 1.2 million schoolchildren. As you might expect, these laptops will be running the best and least expensive OS in the world: Linux.

Actually, this represents a growing trend towards Open Source in developing nations. More on this (hopefully) later.

Mac (slowly) Catching Up

2006-08-19T15:47:00.000-04:00

Check this out. Mac OSX Leopard, which will be available "Spring 2007," has a feature called "Spaces." The idea is quite a simple one, namely having several desktops, each with its own windows running, on one computer, and switching in some way. The idea, however, has been around for years and has been implemented on all the major Linux window managers for years. Fluxbox also offers tabbed windows in addition to virtual workspaces.

So much for "new" and "innovative." Still, Apple seems to be far ahead of Microsoft on this one, no surprise there. Maybe someday Mac OS [insert appropriate number] will actually be a serious competitor with Linux. But if they want to start coming up with stuff before us, they're going to have to be much more open source. Now that would be "reaching enlightenment" as this page so modestly puts it.

Connecticut

2006-08-14T22:08:00.000-04:00

This is probably faked, but brilliant either way. If anyone has actually seen this somewhere please tell me. I found this on the Uncyclopedia, which by the way is a brilliant idea for a website. People who vandalize Wikipedia should be automatically redirected there.

Mahatma Gandhi

2006-07-29T12:14:00.000-04:00

“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”

--Mahatma Gandhi

Religion might be a good thing if its leaders followed its doctrines. Christ taught peace and love, he was anti-imperialist and anti-rich. (It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God [Matt 10:25]) How many of those does George Bush embody?

OH SHUT UP!: A Ground Invasion

2006-07-21T11:56:00.000-04:00

Quintin wrote this: OH SHUT UP!: A Ground Invasion.
I feel the need to respond. Israel is an unstopable power in the Middle East. Unfortunately this may go to Olmert's head. However, there is no reason not to use that area as a buffer zone, since it has already been evacuated and mostly leveled. Why doesn't Secretary Rice broker a treaty now? It could be done.
Also, the Lebanese Christians, a sizeable minority, who have not been bombed, resent Hezbollah more than Israel.

Read This

2006-07-05T21:07:00.000-04:00

A very good point...

(The title of the post is a link, click on it)

Big Brother Microsoft

2006-06-17T18:57:00.000-04:00

Let me pose a hypothetical scenario: let's say someone put spyware on the web, but with some modifications which made it virtually impossible to suspect: let's say it pretended to be from your software maker, Microsoft. In fact, it has the word "Genuine" in the title. And let's say that it sets itself up so that it cannot be uninstalled, and so that it must be running in order for you to download important security updates. Sound scary? It sure does to me.
Actually, this software does exist. It's called Windows Genuine Advantage. Well, you might be saying, what a smart idea those spyware-makers had, pretending to be Microsoft. There's one catch: it isn't pretending to be Microsoft. It is Microsoft. Our good friend Bill Gates has information on any Windows user who has updated in the past month.
It's things like this that make me glad I switched to Linux: I can live without the iTunes Music Store knowing that my web history (which websites I visited and when) is not being read by the company which makes my OS and which I should supposedly trust.

Stupid People

2006-06-16T09:25:00.000-04:00

Why are people so stupid? This never makes sense to me. People know that one thing is better, but they do something else without stopping to think. Plenty of drivers believe that it would be better for the environment if they took public transportation. They can even explain exactly why it would be faster and no more expensive. And yet they drive to work every day. Why? Because they have been given a voucher for free parking at the parking lot four blocks away from their office, farther away than the nearest subway station. Of course, even with this voucher, it is faster and just as cheap and better for the environment to take public transportation, but they choose to drive because it makes them feel that they are saving money.

Standardization

2006-06-13T18:41:00.000-04:00

Standardization is the key to making modern Linux a reality. It's not so much a problem today of not many programs being available for Linux. It's a problem of there being too many different versions of Linux out there. When I went to download Audacity for Linux, there were no less than 7 different versions for different distros of Linux. This is getting ridiculous. Remember that someone must have had to work on 7 different versions of one program. Often I cannot download a program because it is made for Red Hat when I use Ubuntu. I must say I can't blame people who choose not to switch.

A Normal Person's Guide to Geek Politics

2006-06-13T10:27:00.000-04:00

If you have been wondering what I've been talking about the past few posts, click on the title of this post. (it's a link)

The easier it is to be right...

2006-06-11T09:15:00.000-04:00

The easier it is to be right, the less excuse there is for being wrong. We've all said that we would do something if it was easier. Well, it's easier than ever to switch to Linux. Ubuntu 6.06, better known as Dapper Drake, has a live CD with a graphical installer. My old excuse, and the one most people still use, is that Windows is much more compatible than Linux, so switching completely is out of the question. And a year ago, you couldn't really double boot unless you had some training in partitioning, and you would probably have had to configure the boot menu yourself. Today, with Dapper, I was able to partition my drive on my own. I can now dual boot Ubuntu and Windows, and I have a 107 GB shared partition which I can write to with both OS's. All of that took me 30 minutes.